Shorts v. AT&T flexibility, No. 11-1649, 2013 WL 2995944 (W. Va. Ct. Application. June 17, 2013) When Ms. Shorts purchased her AT&T mobile and cordless plan in 2003, the agreement included a forced arbitration clause. In accordance with the court, Ms. Shorts apparently did not create re re payments, and finally her services is ended and she had been charged a very early termination cost that she failed to spend. Continue reading
Based on the court, AT&T sent a commercial collection agency team to gather Ms. Shorts’ financial obligation and also the providers filed a business collection agencies lawsuit against her
Leave a reply